| Financial Audit Division | January 2026 |
The Behavioral Health Administration used single source grants when they were not justified and did not always sufficiently document its reasons for using single source grants. (p. 13)
Recommendations
In its grant agreements, the Behavioral Health Administration did not always cite its statutory authority to administer grants or its authority for specific grant programs. (p. 15)
Recommendations
The Behavioral Health Administration did not always execute grant agreement amendments before the original grant agreements expired. (p. 17)
Recommendations
The Behavioral Health Administration paid some grantees for work performed before it fully executed the grant agreements. (p. 18)
Recommendations
The Behavioral Health Administration overpaid two grantees. (p. 19)
Recommendations
The Behavioral Health Administration did not use a competitive bid process to award mental health provider supervision grant funding. (p. 21)
Recommendations
Prior Audit Finding Not Resolved. The Behavioral Health Administration did not obtain all required progress reports and issued payments to grantees with past-due reports. Some progress reports did not contain all relevant information. (p. 22)
Recommendations
Prior Audit Finding Not Resolved. The Behavioral Health Administration could not demonstrate that it performed some required monitoring visits and did not consistently document some monitoring visits it performed. (p. 24)
Recommendations
Prior Audit Finding Not Resolved. The Behavioral Health Administration could not demonstrate that it completed financial reconciliations in compliance with Office of Grants Management policy. (p. 26)
Recommendations
The Behavioral Health Administration made payments to grantees for costs that were either not incurred or not properly supported by source documents. (p. 28)
Recommendations
Prior Audit Finding Not Resolved. The Behavioral Health Administration did not complete evaluations of grantee performance, as required by Office of Grants Management policy. (p. 30)
Recommendations
The Legislature did not establish a mechanism for oversight of payments made to certain legislatively named entities. As a result, payments made to these entities were not subject to oversight from the Behavioral Health Administration. (p. 32)
Recommendation
The Legislature should consider whether it wants entities that receive “payments” to be considered grantees and subject to Office of Grants Management policy. If not, the Legislature should identify the type of oversight it expects from the Behavioral Health Administration.
Some Behavioral Health Administration staff described poor leadership practices within the administration, and many staff indicated that they did not receive sufficient training to perform grant management tasks. (p. 33)
Recommendations