The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (Minnesota Housing) has generally performed well in implementing its down payment assistance programs, but some improvements can be made.
Home buyers access Minnesota Housing down payment assistance by working with private lending institutions that participate in the agency’s programs. The agency sets rules and guidelines that lenders must follow.
Statutes give Minnesota Housing broad discretion to set policy and priorities regarding down payment assistance. The agency could change or even eliminate its programs at any time. (pp. 17-18)
Recommendation ► The Legislature should consider establishing priorities in statute for Minnesota Housing’s down payment assistance programs. (p. 18)Minnesota Housing rigorously audits a sample of completed loans for program compliance. However, its auditors do not have clear standards for assessing whether lenders charge borrowers inappropriate fees. (p. 32)
Recommendation ► Minnesota Housing should establish policies to better protect home buyers participating in its programs from unreasonable fees and closing costs. (p. 33)Minnesota Housing’s contract with its loan servicer, a bank that administers the loans after they have been made, contains minimal accountability mechanisms. Minnesota Housing’s audits have frequently identified problems that the servicer should have found and addressed. (p. 34)
Recommendation ► In its loan servicing contract, Minnesota Housing should include penalties for inadequate performance. (p. 34)Minnesota Housing has primarily used its own resources to fund down payment assistance. Legislative appropriations have paid for only a small fraction of the total cost of the programs.
Also due to the agency’s funding methods, some home buyers are required to meet federal criteria that do not apply to their mortgage loans. (pp. 44-45)
Minnesota Housing has provided more down payment assistance and served more households than housing finance agencies in most other states, relative to the size of each state’s housing market.
In a letter dated March 25, 2024, Commissioner Ho wrote that Minnesota Housing appreciated OLA’s detailed evaluation. She said the agency would “consider further as part of our ongoing continuous improvement” the report’s recommendations related to lender fees and the agency’s contract with its loan servicer. She provided further comments in response to three other recommendations, noting specifically that “Minnesota Housing will assess the potential for piloting small-scale alternative funding models while maintaining the Agency’s credit ratings and financial stability.” She concluded, “We are pleased that you share our view as to the effective management of the Agency’s down payment assistance programs.”